In August 2010, investors rushed to buy shares in a company. It lent tiny sums to poor women. Three months later, that same company was fighting for survival.
Vikram Akula was born on 7 November 1968. He was born in Ryakal village, Medak district, in present-day Telangana. He grew up in the United States. He studied at Tufts, Yale, and the University of Chicago. He finished a PhD there in 2004. In December 1997, he returned to India. He founded Swayam Krishi Sangam, known as SKS. It began as a non-profit microfinance group. In 2005, SKS became a for-profit company, SKS Microfinance. It gave small loans mainly to poor rural women.
From Non-Profit to IPO
Akula’s SKS grew from a small rural project into a listed company. That rise, and its speed, set up the crisis that followed.
Building SKS
NABARD ran a separate, older model of rural credit. It used non-profit, bank-linked Self-Help Groups, or SHGs. SKS Microfinance was different. It was a private, for-profit NBFC-MFI. See IndEco0192 — NABARD for that separate channel. Under Akula, SKS grew fast. It reached a peak of 7.3 million active borrowers, by 2010-11. Over its history, it lent out more than $5 billion.
True or False: SKS Microfinance began, in 1997, as a for-profit company.
The 2010 IPO
In August 2010, SKS Microfinance held India’s first microfinance IPO. It listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The IPO raised about $350 million, or roughly ₹1,650 crore. It was oversubscribed nearly 14 times over.
True or False: SKS Microfinance’s August 2010 IPO was oversubscribed nearly 14 times.
The 2010 Crisis
Just months after its IPO, SKS faced a sector-wide crisis. It centred on Andhra Pradesh, its largest market by far.
What Went Wrong
Soon after the IPO, a crisis hit India’s whole microfinance sector. Andhra Pradesh was the state hit hardest. The state government pointed to widespread borrower distress. It cited reported suicides, as grounds for tighter rules. The state responded with an Ordinance. It took effect on 15 October 2010. Lenders had to register with the state. It capped how many loans one borrower could take. It also penalised coercive loan recovery.
True or False: The Andhra Pradesh microfinance Ordinance took effect on 15 October 2010.
The Fallout
The Ordinance froze lending and recovery, across the whole sector. SKS Microfinance alone could not recover an estimated ₹1,400 crore in loans. Its share price fell sharply, from its September 2010 peak. In November 2011, Akula resigned. He stepped down as SKS Microfinance’s Executive Chairman. This came after the company reported a large quarterly loss. He stayed on as a consultant, until March 2012.
True or False: Akula resigned as SKS Microfinance’s Executive Chairman, in November 2011.
Life After SKS
Akula’s own recognition, and his later return to the field, round out his story. His career also reflects a bigger debate about microfinance itself.
Recognition and Return
In 2006, TIME magazine named Akula one of its 100 Most Influential People in the World. This honoured his work in microfinance. That same year, he won two more awards. He won the Schwab Social Entrepreneur of the Year award. He also won an EY Entrepreneur of the Year award, in India. He wrote a book about SKS’s rise. It is called “A Fistful of Rice.” Harvard Business Press published it in 2010. In 2014, Akula founded Vaya Finserv. It offers financial services to low-income groups, on behalf of partner banks. This marked his return to microfinance.
True or False: TIME magazine named Akula one of its 100 Most Influential People, in 2006.
A Larger Debate
Akula’s career reflects a broader debate in Indian development policy. Can a market-driven, for-profit model serve the poor responsibly? Or does it risk the same predatory pressures as informal moneylending? Akula’s own career is often cited on both sides of that question.
Exam Edge
Two traps come up often around this topic. Both are worth knowing before an exam.
- Must Know SKS Microfinance is sometimes wrongly grouped with NABARD’s SHG-Bank Linkage Programme. SKS was a private, for-profit NBFC-MFI. NABARD’s SHG model instead runs through non-profit, bank-linked community groups.
- Good to Know Do not blame the 2010 crisis on one bad company or one bad loan. It came from a sector-wide pattern. Many lenders pushed aggressive lending and coercive recovery, in one concentrated state market.
- Great to Know The crisis’s most exam-relevant outcome was regulatory. It led directly to the RBI’s December 2011 creation of a separate, tighter NBFC-MFI category, based on the Malegam Committee’s work.
Q: In what year did Akula found SKS?
A: In December 1997, as a non-profit microfinance organisation.
Q: What milestone did SKS Microfinance’s August 2010 listing mark?
A: India’s first microfinance IPO, on the Bombay Stock Exchange.
Q: Why did Akula resign as Executive Chairman, in November 2011?
A: After SKS Microfinance reported a large quarterly loss, during the crisis.
Q: What did the RBI create in December 2011, as a result of the crisis?
A: A separate, more tightly regulated NBFC-MFI category, nationwide.
Q: What tension does Akula’s career often illustrate, in policy debates?
A: Whether for-profit models can serve the poor responsibly, or risk predatory pressure.
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Leave a Reply