Attitude feels subjective, but psychologists have developed real, testable tools to measure it with reasonable consistency.
Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude · Ethics0065
Measuring Attitude: Scales & Tests
Explicit Measures
Likert scale: rate agreement, numbered scale
Semantic differential: rate between opposite adjectives
Implicit Measures
Implicit Association Test (IAT)
Infers attitude from reaction time, automatic bias
Measurement Limits
Social desirability bias skews self-reports
Question wording and scale format shift results
Two lenses, sometimes two different pictures
Implicit measures sometimes reveal attitudes that differ from what a person consciously reports — raising real questions about which one better predicts actual behaviour.
Must Know
- Psychologists use standardized psychological instruments to measure attitude, allowing comparison across individuals and over time.
- The Likert scale, a common attitude-measurement tool, asks respondents to rate agreement with statements on a numbered scale.
- The semantic differential scale measures attitude by asking respondents to rate a concept between pairs of opposite adjectives, like good-bad or strong-weak.
- Implicit attitude measures, including the Implicit Association Test, aim to capture attitudes people may not consciously report or even recognize in themselves.
- Explicit attitude measures rely on direct self-report, while implicit measures infer attitude from reaction time and automatic associations.
Good to Know
- Self-report measures can be affected by social desirability bias, where respondents answer in ways they believe are more socially acceptable.
- Implicit measures sometimes reveal attitudes that differ from what a person consciously reports, highlighting a gap between explicit and implicit attitude.
- Survey design choices, including question wording and scale format, can meaningfully affect the attitudes researchers measure.
Test Yourself
Great to Know
- The gap between explicit and implicit attitude measures raises important questions about which better predicts actual future behaviour.
- Reliable attitude measurement matters directly for public administration, informing everything from policy design to public communication strategy.
- Understanding measurement limitations helps prevent overconfidence in survey results that may not fully capture genuine underlying attitudes.
Beyond the answer
Browse all ethics-integrity-and-aptitude topics →
📚 Keep reading
Ethics0060 — Attitude, Thought and PolarizationEthics0044 — Attitude: Content, Structure, and FunctionEthics0063 — The Political Attitude SpectrumEthics0062 — Moral Attitude and TemptationIndSoc0081 — Population Education: Objectives and Measures in India❓ Practice this topic
D0411 — Which statement best fits the utilitarian reading of the Snowden case?D0410 — What should a genuine whistleblower normally do first?D0409 — What did the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015 do?D0408 — In which year did Snowden's NSA revelations first appear in the press?🎲 Take a Ethics Integrity And Aptitude Quiz
Leave a Reply