India begins with a map. Articles 1 to 4 name the Union and mark out its territory. They also give Parliament the power to create new States or redraw old ones. This is how Telangana, Uttarakhand and the Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh came about. Let us see how the four articles work, one step at a time.
Union of States: The phrase in Article 1. It says States cannot secede.
First Schedule: The list of all States and Union territories.
Article 3: Reshapes territory already inside India.
Article 368: The route for amending the Constitution.
1Chapter 1: Article 1, the Union and Its Territory
Must Know
What Article 1 says
- Article 1 says India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
- The States and their territories are listed in the First Schedule.
- The territory has three parts: the States, the Union territories, and any territory acquired later.
- The First Schedule is the Constitution’s own atlas.
Why “Union” and not “Federation”
- In 1947 the Constituent Assembly inherited over 500 princely states and a patchwork of provinces.
- It had to knit them into one country.
- Ambedkar chose “Union of States” over “Federation”.
- He wanted to show that States cannot secede.
- The Union is indestructible. Its States are not.
State versus Union Territory
- A State has its own elected government. It controls most subjects day to day.
- A Union Territory is usually run by the Centre, often through an Administrator.
- Article 1(3) lists them separately for this reason.
- Both are part of India’s territory.
Remember: Union of States means States cannot secede. Parliament can redraw them, but they cannot walk out.
True or False: Under Article 1, a State has the right to secede from the Union.
2Chapter 2: Articles 2, 3 and 4, Reshaping the Map
Must Know
Article 2 and Article 3
- Article 2: Parliament may admit new territory into the Union, or establish new States.
- It can do so on terms it thinks fit.
- Article 3: Parliament may reshape territory already inside India.
- It can form a new State, or unite States or parts of States.
- It can increase or reduce a State’s area.
- It can alter a State’s boundary or change its name.
- Sikkim’s entry in 1975 used the Article 2 side. Telangana’s birth in 2014 used Article 3.
Article 4, the shortcut
- Article 4 says laws under Articles 2 and 3 are not amendments under Article 368.
- So they pass by simple majority, like an ordinary law.
- No special majority is needed. No ratification by half the States is needed.
- Article 4 also lets these laws amend the First and Fourth Schedules directly.
The safeguards
- An Article 3 Bill can be introduced only on the President’s recommendation.
- The President then refers it to the State Legislature for its views, within a time he sets.
- Parliament is not bound by those views.
- In 2014 the Andhra Pradesh Assembly rejected the Telangana Bill.
- Parliament passed it anyway.
Remember: Articles 2–3 laws pass by simple majority. They are not Article 368 amendments.
True or False: A law forming a new State under Article 3 needs ratification by half the State legislatures.
Think it through: Think it through: Telangana or Sikkim?
Andhra Pradesh was already inside India, so splitting it used Article 3. Sikkim began outside the Union. Its journey needed the 35th and 36th Amendments.
3Chapter 3: How the Map Was Redrawn
Good to Know
1956, India on linguistic lines
- The States Reorganisation Act, 1956 redrew the map on linguistic lines.
- It created 14 States and 6 Union territories.
- It was passed under Article 3.
The three States of 2000
- 1 November 2000: Chhattisgarh was carved out of Madhya Pradesh.
- 9 November 2000: Uttarakhand, then called Uttaranchal, was carved out of Uttar Pradesh.
- 15 November 2000: Jharkhand was carved out of Bihar.
- All three were born within a fortnight.
2014 and 2019
- 2 June 2014: Telangana became the 29th State, out of Andhra Pradesh.
- It is the latest full State created under Article 3.
- The J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019 split Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories.
- This used Article 3 too.
Name changes also use Article 3
- Pondicherry became Puducherry on 1 October 2006.
- Uttaranchal became Uttarakhand on 1 January 2007.
- Orissa became Odisha in 2011.
- These were renamings under Article 3, not new States.
- Uttarakhand was therefore renamed after being created. It had two names in seven years.
Sikkim, a different road
- The 35th Amendment (1974) made Sikkim an Associate State.
- The 36th Amendment (1975) made it a full State.
- Sikkim came by constitutional amendments, not by an ordinary Article 3 law.
True or False: Telangana became India’s 29th State on 2 June 2014.
True or False: Sikkim became a full State through an ordinary Article 3 law.
4Chapter 4: When Article 3 Is Not Enough
Great to Know
Berubari, 1960
- In In re: Berubari Union (1960), the Supreme Court limited Article 3.
- Article 3 covers reshaping territory inside India only.
- It cannot hand Indian territory to a foreign country.
- The Berubari enclave was to go to Pakistan under the Nehru–Noon Agreement.
- That needed a full Article 368 amendment, the 9th Amendment, 1960.
Bangladesh, 2015
- The 2015 land boundary deal with Bangladesh followed the same route.
- The 100th Amendment changed the First Schedule.
- It also needed ratification by State legislatures.
- Both cases gave up Indian territory. Both needed Article 368, not Article 3.
Remember: Reshaping inside India = Article 3. Giving territory to another country = Article 368 amendment.
True or False: Transferring Indian territory to a foreign country needs an Article 368 amendment.
Think it through: Think it through: why did Berubari need an amendment?
Article 3 only changes boundaries between parts of India. Giving land to another country changes the Union’s own territory, so the Constitution itself had to change.
5Chapter 5: The Map in the News
Great to Know
Gorkha statehood talks, August 2026
- On 23 August 2026 the Centre formed a committee under former deputy NSA Pankaj Kumar Singh.
- It is to work out a “permanent political solution” to the Gorkha issue in Darjeeling.
- It is the clearest sign yet that an Article 3 proposal could follow.
- Source: The Hitavada.
- Every new State demand is really a question of whether Parliament will use Article 3.
True or False: The Gorkha committee of August 2026 is linked to a possible Article 3 proposal.
6Previous Year Questions
Exam angle: real questions on this topic.
CDS I 2021, Q67
Does creating a new State need an Article 368 amendment? No. See the question.
CDS II 2019, Q48
Parliament can alter boundaries and names under Article 3. See the question.
CDS II 2018, Q86
Sikkim was admitted by the 36th Amendment. See the question.
CDS II 2016, Q120
The 2015 Bangladesh transfer was done by legislation amending the First Schedule. See the question.
CDS I 2019, Q48
Parliament may increase or diminish a State’s area. See the question.
CAPF ACs 2018, Q70
Sikkim became an Associate State by the 35th Amendment. See the question.
Quick Q&A
- Article 1 phrase? Union of States.
- Article 4 does what? Keeps Art 2–3 laws outside Art 368.
- 29th State? Telangana, 2014.
- Sikkim full State by? 36th Amendment, 1975.
- Berubari needed? 9th Amendment, 1960.
MCQ on Union and Its Territory
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Answered 0 of 6 checks.
Leave a Reply