Menu

Allelopathy: Role in Irrigated Cropping Systems

Allelopathy is a chemical effect of one plant on another. The chemicals are called allelochemicals. It is not the same as shading or taking water.
Black walnut tree (Juglans nigra) standing in a field
A black walnut tree (Juglans nigra) in a field. Its roots release juglone, a classic allelochemical that suppresses sensitive crops. Photo: Adrian S Pye / Geograph Britain and Ireland, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

At a Glance

Four facts to hold on to.

01

Term

Coined by Hans Molisch, 1937.

02

Releases

Roots, leaf wash, crop residue, volatiles.

03

Use

Weed control in rice–wheat systems.

04

Limit

Dose, soil and weather change the result.

AllelochemicalA chemical one plant releases that affects another.
AutotoxicityA plant harmed by its own chemicals.
SorgaabWater extract of sorghum plants.
IWMIntegrated weed management: several tools together.

The Chemical Link

Must Know

Competition versus allelopathy

Ordinary competitionAllelopathy
Plants seek the same light, water and nutrientsA plant releases a chemical into its surroundings
No chemical action neededThe chemical changes seed or root growth, or soil life
  • Hans Molisch used the word in 1937. His meaning included helpful and harmful effects.
  • Farm studies often focus on harm to weeds.
  • Black walnut releases juglone. Sensitive plants nearby may suffer.
  • That does not prove every small crop fails near every walnut.

Release routes

  1. Roots release chemicals.
  2. Rain or irrigation washes leaves.
  3. Crop remains break down.
  4. Soil moves or changes the chemicals.

True or False: Hans Molisch’s 1937 definition of allelopathy covered both harmful and beneficial effects.

Irrigated Farming

Good to Know

What irrigation changes

  • Irrigation helps crops grow. It can help weeds too.
  • Water can carry or dilute plant chemicals.
  • The effect depends on how much water arrives and when.

Roots, residue, extracts

  • Living roots release small amounts of chemicals. Some rice varieties slow weeds more than others. Shade also matters.
  • Straw blocks light and slows weed seeds. As it rots it may release chemicals. Field studies struggle to split the two.
  • Researchers soak plant parts in water and spray the extract. Dose, crop stage and weed change the outcome.
  • A cover crop may hold weeds back. Its remains may slow the next crop.
  • An ICAR-linked Karnal study tested rice straw in a rice–wheat system. Residue amount changed the weed groups in wheat. Source: ICAR-linked study.
  • Do not burn straw to keep this effect. Burning removes the residue.
  • See conservation agriculture and zero tillage.

True or False: Burning rice and wheat straw preserves its weed-suppressing value for the next crop.

Trials and Limits

Great to Know

Sorgaab

  • Sorgaab is a water extract of sorghum.
  • In a Pakistan cotton trial, sorgaab with reduced pendimethalin cut weed dry weight by 73% (half dose) or 82% (one-third dose).
  • That is trial evidence, not a promise for every crop.
  • Sources: sorgaab field trial; authors’ 2005 summary.

Weed-suppressing rice

  • Some rice lines hold weeds back better than others.
  • IRRI studied rice allelopathy in field and lab work. It noted how hard it is to split chemical action from competition. Source: FAO, IRRI research.
  • A line that works on one weed may not work on all.
  • Seed choice must still meet yield, disease and weather needs.

Why results change

  • A weak dose may do little. A strong one may hurt the crop.
  • Soil microbes, rain, irrigation, weed type and spray time matter.
  • Autotoxicity is real: a crop can be harmed by its own chemicals.
  • Allelopathy can join integrated weed management with rotation, clean seed, timely weeding and careful herbicide use.
  • Natural does not always mean harmless or enough.
Think it through: why is a lab allelopathy result not a proven field saving?

Soil, microbes, dose, rain and timing change real fields. Shade and competition can also explain part of an effect. A farm trial must separate them.

True or False: Sorgaab with a reduced herbicide dose cut weed dry weight by 73–82% in a cotton trial.

True or False: A crop can never be harmed by its own allelochemicals.

Exam Edge

Previous Year Questions

UPSC Mains 2016 asked about allelopathy.

  • UPSC Mains 2016, GS III, Q8The question asks about allelopathy in the major cropping systems of irrigated agriculture. Begin with the chemical definition. Show roots, crop remains and water extracts. End with field limits and careful weed management. View the question.
  • Exam trapsShade alone is not allelopathy. A lab effect is not a proven field saving. A plant chemical can hurt the crop itself. Burning residue does not keep its benefits.

True or False: UPSC Mains 2016 asked about allelopathy in the major cropping systems of irrigated agriculture.

True or False: IRRI has never studied allelopathy in rice.

Quick Q&A

Coined by?

Hans Molisch, 1937.

Walnut chemical?

Juglone.

Sorgaab?

Sorghum water extract.

Self-harm?

Autotoxicity.

Mains 2016 Q8?

Allelopathy in irrigated systems.

0 / 6 correct

🎲 Practice: Allelopathy in Irrigated Farming

4 verified questions from this topic.

Question 1 of 1

Who coined the term ‘allelopathy’?

Question 1 of 1

Which chemical released by black walnut trees suppresses sensitive crops planted nearby?

Question 1 of 1

Why are allelopathic rice varieties prized in irrigated rice cultivation?

Question 1 of 1

Consider the following statements:

1. Allelopathy always harms neighbouring plants.

2. Allelopathic crop residues can suppress weeds in the next crop.

3. Allelopathic effects do not depend on concentration or soil microbes.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
🎲 More Environment and Ecology Practice
Was this helpful?

Beyond the answer

    Leave a Reply

    [privacy-do-not-sell-link]

    Discover more from MCQ Questions

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading

    ✨Ask doubt
    ✨ Ask a Question AI×
    [privacy-do-not-sell-link]