India’s first attempt to find backward classes beyond Dalits and Adivasis produced a list of 2,399 castes and communities. The government rejected the report anyway. Even the chairman, Kaka Kalelkar, doubted parts of it.
Article 340: Lets the President appoint a backward classes commission.
Most backward: 837 of the 2,399 castes.
Creamy layer: Well-off OBC members, excluded in 1992.
Mandal: The Second Backward Classes Commission.
1Chapter 1: The First Backward Classes Commission
Must Know
Set up and led
- The Kalelkar Commission is formally the First Backward Classes Commission.
- It was set up on 29 January 1953 by a Presidential Order, under Article 340.
- Its chairman was Kaka Kalelkar, a Gandhian writer and social reformer.
Its task
- It had to identify which sections of society, beyond Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, were socially and educationally backward.
- It also had to recommend steps to help them.
The report
- The Commission submitted its report on 30 March 1955.
- It listed 2,399 castes and communities as backward, across the country.
- Of these, 837 were classed as “most backward”.
- It recommended quotas in government services: 25% in Class I, 33.5% in Class II, and 40% in Classes III and IV.
- It also recommended 70% reservation for backward-class students in technical and professional institutions.
The rejection
- The Central Government rejected the report.
- Its argument: the Commission had relied on caste, not objective non-caste criteria.
Remember: Kalelkar: 1953 set up, 1955 report, 2,399 castes, 837 most backward, quotas 25/33.5/40, Centre rejected it.
True or False: The Kalelkar Commission was set up under Article 340.
2Chapter 2: Inside the Report
Good to Know
How it defined “backward”
- Low position in the traditional Hindu caste hierarchy.
- Lack of general educational advancement.
- Inadequate representation in government service, trade and industry.
A chairman with doubts
- Kalelkar himself had doubts about some recommendations.
- In his forwarding letter to the President, he expressed reservations.
- He did not file a formal note of dissent.
- A chairman questioning his own report is unusual.
- It shows real internal disagreement, not unanimous certainty.
Other recommendations
- It reviewed the existing SC and ST lists and recommended changes.
- These went into the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1956.
- It recommended caste-wise enumeration in the 1961 Census.
- That was not implemented at the time.
- It also recommended treating all women, as a group, as a backward class.
About Kaka Kalelkar
- He lived from 1885 to 1981.
- He was a Rajya Sabha member from 1952 to 1964.
- He received the Padma Vibhushan in 1964.
- See Padma Awards.
Remember: Criteria: caste rank, low education, poor representation in jobs, trade and industry.
True or False: Kalelkar filed a formal note of dissent against his own report.
3Chapter 3: The Dilemma That Stayed
Great to Know
Twenty-four years later
- After the rejection, India waited 24 years before setting up a similar body.
- That was the Second Backward Classes Commission, the Mandal Commission, set up in 1979.
- Its 27% OBC quota reached the Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992).
- A nine-judge Bench upheld it, by 6:3.
- The same ruling introduced the “creamy layer”, excluding well-off OBC members.
- It also fixed a 50% general ceiling on reservations, still debated today.
- See V.P. Singh and the Mandal Commission Controversy and Revisiting the 50% Cap on Reservation.
Different numbers, same question
- Kalelkar’s 25/33.5/40 percentages differ from the familiar 27% OBC quota that came from Mandal.
- Both reports tried to answer the same question.
- Is caste a valid measure of disadvantage, or just one proxy among several?
- That dilemma was never fully settled.
An idea that came back
- The 1955 push for caste-wise Census counts anticipates today’s caste-census debates.
- See Caste Census: The Bihar Survey and the National Debate.
- And see Census 2027, which revives the idea about 70 years later.
Think it through: Think it through: why reject a report on caste?
The Centre said caste alone is a weak test. A rich family and a poor one can share a caste. The Mandal Commission later added the creamy layer to fix exactly this gap.
True or False: Kalelkar recommended 70% reservation in technical and professional institutions.
Quick Q&A
- Commission set up? 29 January 1953.
- Report date? 30 March 1955.
- Castes listed? 2,399.
- Most backward? 837.
- Mandal Commission set up? 1979.
MCQ on Kalelkar Commission
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Answered 0 of 3 checks.
Leave a Reply