14,988+ Questions · 21 Subjects · Free to Practice

MCQ Questions

Articles Questions Current Affairs PYQ Papers My Progress

Questions

Practice mode — a mixed feed of questions and articles for each subject. Prefer reading first? Browse the Articles index instead →

General Knowledge Ancient Indian History Medieval Indian History Modern Indian History India After Independence World History Indian Polity & Constitution Indian Governance Indian Economy International Relations Science & Technology General Science Environment & Ecology Indian Geography World Geography Indian Society Art & Culture Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude Quantitative Aptitude Reasoning English Language

Articles

Study mode — the full article library for each subject, no practice questions mixed in. Want to practice instead? Browse Questions by subject →

In Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court directed a selection committee of the PM, Leader of Opposition, and the CJI. How does Parliament’s own 2023 Act differ from this?

Please wait…

1. In Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court directed a selection committee of the PM, Leader of Opposition, and the CJI. How does Parliament’s own 2023 Act differ from this?

It replaces the CJI with a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the PM

It removes the Leader of Opposition instead of the CJI

It adds the Vice-President to the committee alongside the CJI

It matches the Court’s direction exactly, with no changes

Loading…

Keep practicing

Beyond the answer

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

MCQquestion.com

Free MCQ practice for UPSC and State competitive exams — 30,000+ questions across 21 subjects, with the reasoning behind every answer.

In Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court directed a selection committee of the PM, Leader of Opposition, and the CJI. How does Parliament’s own 2023 Act differ from this?

Keep practicing

Beyond the answer

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Discover more from MCQ Questions