
At a glance
Four facts that settle most exam questions on this topic
Two units
Allowances permit covered emissions; offset credits record a claimed cut or removal.
India’s CCTS
Notified June 2023, run by BEE, with a Compliance and an Offset Mechanism.
Intensity, not a cap
India’s targets are emissions per unit of output, not an absolute limit.
Article 6
Paris Agreement’s 6.2, 6.4, and 6.8 govern how countries trade climate outcomes.
On this page
What a carbon market actually trades
One accounting unit, two kinds of certificate
Carbon dioxide equivalent (COβe) puts different greenhouse gases on one scale. One tonne of COβe is the usual accounting unit.
- An allowance permits covered emissions under a trading scheme. A regulator issues it under an emissions limit.
- An offset credit records an estimated cut or removal against a project baseline.
- Both can be traded, but they are not automatically interchangeable. The scheme’s rules decide which units count for each obligation.
Good to Know
Who pays whom
- A government can auction allowances and collect the payment itself, or it may give allowances away for free.
- A carbon tax charges emissions at a set rate. It is a separate pricing tool, not a traded credit.
- Compliance markets impose legal duties on covered firms. Voluntary markets allow purchases without that legal duty, but buyers still need honest claims about what pollution remains.
Sources: World Bank carbon pricing review, ICAP.
True or False: Carbon markets can never send money from firms to the government.
Two market designs: cap-and-trade and baseline-and-credit
Cap-and-trade starts with a limit
Cap-and-trade starts with an overall emissions limit. Firms receive or buy allowances, then trade them. If allowances become scarce, their price can rise, giving firms a stronger reason to cut emissions.
| Design | Starting point | How a unit is earned |
|---|---|---|
| Cap-and-trade | An overall emissions limit | Buy, receive, or sell allowances against the cap |
| Baseline-and-credit | A project or firm’s own baseline | Beat the baseline to earn a credit |
Good to Know
India’s version: intensity, not a cap
- Baseline-and-credit compares a project or firm’s result with a stated baseline. Better performance can earn credits.
- India’s main compliance target is emissions intensity: emissions per unit of output. It is not an economy-wide emissions cap.
- A firm can cut emissions per unit and still raise its total emissions, if output grows enough.
Watch this trap: an intensity target measures efficiency, not the total pollution a firm releases. Both numbers matter for judging real climate progress.
True or False: A voluntary carbon-credit buyer faces the same legal duty as a firm with a compliance target.
India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme
One law, two mechanisms
The 2022 Energy Conservation amendment enabled India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). The government notified it in June 2023. A December 2023 amendment added a voluntary Offset Mechanism beside the mandatory Compliance Mechanism.
- The Compliance Mechanism covers named industrial entities, who earn or owe certificates by beating or missing a notified emissions-intensity target.
- The Offset Mechanism lets eligible, non-obligated project developers earn certificates by proving an extra cut, avoidance, or removal against a baseline.
- Offset certificates do not automatically satisfy a firm’s compliance shortfall. Their use depends on the scheme’s detailed eligibility rules.
Good to Know
Who runs it, and how a target works
The Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) administers CCTS. The central government names obligated firms and notifies their targets, measured in tonnes of COβe per unit of product.
- A firm below its target may earn Carbon Credit Certificates (CCCs). A firm above target must surrender eligible certificates for its shortfall.
- Accredited agencies verify reported data, and the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission regulates certificate trading.
- The earlier Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) programme dealt with energy savings. Relevant sectors are moving into CCTS in stages.
Sources: BEE scheme overview, Ministry of Power, February 2026.
True or False: India sets CCTS compliance targets as emissions per unit of output.
A credit’s route from project to buyer
Five steps, and none can be skipped
- Baseline. Estimate what would happen without the project.
- Additionality. Show the project adds a benefit beyond that baseline.
- Monitoring. Measure the actual result using an approved method.
- Verification. An accredited third party checks the claim.
- Registry and retirement. Issue a numbered credit, then cancel it once claimed, so one credit cannot support two claims.
Remember this: a credit works like a numbered ticket. Once used, it is marked spent and cannot be sold again for the same claim. Registration alone does not prove that credits have been earned.
True or False: A project earns offset credits as soon as it registers, without later monitoring.
Think it through: a forest project says it stopped 100 tonnes of emissions. What must be checked?
Check the baseline first. Would the forest have stayed standing anyway, or was clearing likely without the project? Then check the measurement method, the risk of leakage into a nearby area, and the risk of later forest loss to fire or land-use change.
Independent verification and a registry record matter too. The buyer must retire the credits it uses for its own claim, so nobody else can reuse them.
Why some credits are weak
Four failure modes to watch for
- Additionality. A project should not earn credits for work that would happen anyway.
- Leakage. Stopping forest loss in one area may simply shift clearing elsewhere.
- Permanence. Stored carbon may return to the air after a fire or land-use change.
- Double counting. Two buyers, or two countries, must not claim the same cut as their own.
Weak baselines can create too many credits, letting buyers claim progress without matching real cuts. Good rules also protect local land rights and share benefits fairly.
Sources: BEE safeguards, UN climate accounting guide.
True or False: A forest offset stays permanent even if the stored carbon later burns.
Paris Agreement Article 6
Three tracks under one article
- Article 6.2 covers cooperation between countries using transferred climate outcomes, with accounting rules that address double counting.
- Article 6.4 provides a United Nations-supervised crediting mechanism.
- Article 6.8 supports cooperation without trading.
A corresponding adjustment changes national accounts when an authorised outcome moves abroad, so both countries cannot claim the same cut.
| Instrument | What it mainly records |
|---|---|
| CCTS carbon credit | A verified emissions result under CCTS rules |
| PAT savings certificate | Extra energy saved against an efficiency target |
| Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) | A qualifying unit of renewable electricity attributes |
| Green credit | An eligible environmental action under separate green-credit rules |
The older Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) worked under the Kyoto Protocol. Paris rules are different, so old CDM credits do not automatically become new Article 6 credits.
Sources: UN Climate Change Article 6, Kyoto Protocol.
2026 Update: CCTS Moves Ahead, and India Signs a Second Bilateral Carbon Deal
India’s compliance market takes its first real steps
Through 2026, India’s CCTS moved from published rules toward operating obligations. BEE has notified emissions-intensity targets for the compliance sectors and continued expanding its list of approved offset methods and accredited verification agencies.
- Planned sectors include aluminium, cement, chemicals, refining, paper, steel, and textiles, with coverage and target years fixed by separate notifications.
- A promised trading date is a forecast, not proof that trades occurred. The scheme’s actual issuance and trading records sit in BEE’s own registry.
A second Article 6.2 bilateral track
In April 2026, India and South Korea signed a Memorandum of Cooperation under Paris Agreement Article 6.2, covering investment-driven mitigation projects in hard-to-abate sectors such as steel, cement, and heavy transport. This makes South Korea India’s second bilateral carbon-cooperation partner, after Japan’s Joint Crediting Mechanism.
- Article 6.2 lets two countries trade internationally transferred mitigation outcomes directly, outside any single UN-run registry.
- This shows Article 6.2 is not one fixed deal. It is an expanding network of separate government-to-government agreements, each needing its own corresponding-adjustment accounting.
The UK recognises CCTS under its carbon border tax
- The UK has listed India’s CCTS as a qualifying carbon pricing scheme under its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).
- Indian exporters can claim relief in the UK for carbon prices already paid in India. So they are not charged twice for the same emissions.
- Covered goods include steel, aluminium, fertiliser and cement. The UK CBAM starts in 2027.
- The relief depends on the carbon price actually paid in India, backed by verified evidence.
Sources: BEE framework, Mongabay India, Carbon Pulse, Free Press Journal, GOV.UK.
True or False: India’s CCTS compliance target is an absolute national cap on total emissions.
True or False: India’s April 2026 Article 6.2 deal with South Korea is a separate bilateral track from Japan’s Joint Crediting Mechanism.
What examiners test here
UPSC CSP 2023 gave two statements: carbon markets may become a widespread climate tool, and they transfer resources from private firms to the State. The official answer is B: both are correct, but the second does not explain the first.
- UPSC CSP 2023A government can auction allowances and collect money from firms, which makes the second statement possible. But free allocation and firm-to-firm trading also exist, so not every market sends all payments to the State. View this question on the full 2023 paper →
Quick Q&A
What is the difference between an allowance and an offset credit?
An allowance permits covered emissions under a cap; an offset credit records a claimed cut or removal against a baseline.
When was India’s CCTS notified, and under which law?
June 2023, under the 2022 Energy Conservation amendment.
Which body administers India’s CCTS?
The Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE).
Is India’s CCTS target an absolute cap or an intensity target?
An intensity target: emissions per unit of output, not a total national cap.
What does Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement do?
It provides a United Nations-supervised carbon crediting mechanism.
What did India’s CCTS look like through 2026?
BEE notified sector targets and expanded approved offset methods and verification agencies, moving the scheme from rules toward actual trading.
What did India sign with South Korea in April 2026?
A Memorandum of Cooperation under Paris Agreement Article 6.2, India’s second bilateral carbon-cooperation track after Japan’s Joint Crediting Mechanism.
0 / 0
MCQ on Carbon Markets
Try 6 practice questions on carbon credits, CCTS, and Article 6.
Question 1 of 1 Question 1 of 1 Question 1 of 1 Question 1 of 1 Question 1 of 1 Question 1 of 1
Leave a Reply