🏛️ Must Know
What Honour Killing Is
- DefinitionHonour killing is violence, usually murder, committed by a family or community against a person.
- The justificationIt is typically justified as punishment for a marriage or relationship the family disapproves of.
- No single national lawIndia has no single national law against honour killing.
- Why this mattersThe legal framework is built in pieces — general criminal law plus court directions.
- So whatHonour killing is addressed through existing murder and conspiracy law.
The Key Legal Events
- 2012 Law CommissionRecommended a central law against honour-based crimes; no Bill was introduced.
- 2018 Shakti VahiniThe Supreme Court held honour-based interference in marriage violates Article 21.
- 2019 RajasthanPassed the first state-level law against honour-based crimes.
- So whatProgress has come through courts and one state, not a central statute.
🏘️ Good to Know
The Story of the Legal Response
- 242nd Report 2012The Law Commission recommended a central law; no MP ever introduced the Bill.
- Shakti Vahini 2018The Court held interference with choice of marriage partner violates Article 21.
- Rajasthan 2019Became the first state to pass a dedicated law.
- So whatThe central-law gap remains; state and court action fill it.
The Article 21 Foundation
- Choice of partnerShakti Vahini held the choice of marriage partner is protected under Article 21.
- AutonomyA person’s decision to marry whom they choose is part of personal liberty.
- Why it mattersArticle 21 is the constitutional basis for the ruling.
- So whatHonour interference violates the right to life and personal liberty.
✅ Test Yourself
Work through a 5-question chain on Honour Killing and the Law, then keep practising with a random Indian Polity question.
⚡ Great to Know
The BNS Renumbering
- IPC to BNSThe Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (2023) replaced the IPC.
- Murder chargeIPC Section 302 (murder) became BNS Section 103.
- Conspiracy chargeIPC Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) became BNS Section 61.
- So whatHonour killing is prosecuted under these renumbered provisions.
- Why it mattersKnowing the BNS sections is a current, precise exam point.
🎯 Exam Angle (PYQ & MCQ Traps)
The ‘No Law At All’ Trap
- Trap optionIndia has no legal remedy against honour killing.
- DistractorThere is no dedicated national law, so it sounds lawless.
- Fact testedGeneral murder and conspiracy law applies, plus the Shakti Vahini directions.
- Eliminate fastIf an option says there is no remedy, it ignores the general criminal law.
- Try this ruleNo special law, but general law + court directions apply.
The ‘Shakti Vahini = Central Law’ Trap
- Trap optionShakti Vahini created a central anti-honour-killing statute.
- DistractorThe ruling is famous, so it feels like a law.
- Fact testedShakti Vahini is a Supreme Court judgment invoking Article 21, not a statute.
- Eliminate fastIf an option calls it a central law, it confuses a ruling with a statute.
- Try this ruleShakti Vahini = court ruling under Article 21.
📰 Current Affairs
Why This Stays Relevant
- DevelopmentKhap panchayats and honour crimes keep the debate alive.
- Why it mattersThe absence of a central law remains a policy gap.
- So whatExpect it linked to current criminal-law reform questions.
Beyond the answer
Browse all indian-polity-and-constitution topics →
📚 Keep reading
Which of the following Acts, receiving presidential assent on 24 December 2023, replaced the Indian Telegraph Act 1885, the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1933 and the Telegraph Wires (Unlawful Possession) Act 1950?Under Article 61 of the Constitution, by what majority must the resolution preferring the charge of impeachment against the President be passed in each House of Parliament?Which Article of the Constitution provides that it shall be the endeavour of every State to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage to children belonging to linguistic minority groups?In which situation can a State Governor issue an ordinance under Article 213 of the Constitution?Consider the following statements: Statement-I: While the Union Government may borrow inside and outside the country within limits fixed by Parliament (Article 292), States are mandated under Article 293 to borrow only inside the country. Statement-II: The Public Debt of India includes only the internal and external liabilities of the Central Government. Which is correct?❓ Practice these questions
In which situation can a State Governor issue an ordinance under Article 213 of the Constitution?Which Article of the Constitution permits reservation in admissions to private educational institutions, including unaided ones, for socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes?Which writ challenges the legal right of a person to hold a public office?Which writ is issued by a higher court to quash an order already passed by a lower court or tribunal?
Leave a Reply