CONSTITUTION OF INDIAArticle 131
“
Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Supreme Court shall, to the exclusion of any other court, have original jurisdiction in any dispute — (a) between the Government of India and one or more States; or (b) … or (c) between two or more States, if and in so far as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends.
mcqquestion.com · Indian Polity⚖️ Exam Edge
⚖️ Article 131: Original Jurisdiction
Disputes between the Centre and States go straight to the Supreme Court.
Art. 131Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
DisputesCentre vs States, or States vs States
ExclusiveOnly the SC can hear these in the first instance
FederalUmpires federal disputes between units
ConditionsMust involve a question of legal right
ExamDistinguish from writ (Art 32) and appellate jurisdiction
💡The trap: Article 131 is the Supreme Court’s exclusive original jurisdiction over Centre-State and inter-State disputes.
mcqquestion.comUPSC · CDS · NDA · CAPF · SSC
To the exclusion of any other court and a legal right define the scope precisely — only Governments can be parties.
Only two kinds of party can ever appear in this lawsuit: a State, or the Union. Not a company. Not a citizen. Article 131 draws that line, and a 2024 case testing it is still before a 5-judge Bench.
MCQ QuestionsPolity0297
Article 131: Where States Sue the Union
Four cases that shaped who can use it, and for what.
1963
State of West Bengal v. Union of India
The first major Article 131 case. The Court rejects West Bengal’s sovereignty claim and allows Parliament to acquire coal-bearing State land.
1969-70
State of Bihar v. Union of India
The Court drops private companies from a Bihar suit. Article 131 is Government-versus-Government only.
1977
State of Karnataka v. Union of India
A suit over a Commission of Inquiry against Karnataka’s own Chief Minister is held maintainable, reading “legal right” broadly.
2024
Kerala sues over Union-imposed borrowing limits. The Court affirms Article 131 as a real constitutional right, and refers the fiscal question to a 5-judge Bench.
Rarely used, exclusively powerful: Article 131 gives the Supreme Court sole authority over Union-State and State-State legal disputes. But most Centre-State friction still gets fought politically, not in this courtroom.
Indian Politymcqquestion.com
🏛️ Must Know
The Exclusive Jurisdiction
- Article 131Gives the Supreme Court exclusive original jurisdiction over certain disputes.
- The partiesThe disputes are between the Union and one or more States, or between States themselves.
- Legal rightThe dispute must involve a question on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends.
- Only GovtsOnly the Union and States can be parties; private individuals and companies cannot be joined.
- The provisoA proviso excludes disputes arising from pre-Constitution treaties or agreements.
Why It’s Rare but Powerful
- Sole authorityArticle 131 gives the Supreme Court sole authority over Union-State and State-State disputes.
- Rarely usedMost Centre-State friction is fought politically, not in this courtroom.
- So whatIts exclusivity and its rarity are both testable.
Article 262 Interaction
- Water disputesArticle 262 empowers Parliament to exclude certain interstate water disputes from the Court.
- EffectIt can bar Article 131 jurisdiction over those disputes.
- So what131 and 262 together define which Centre-State disputes reach the Court.
- How to recall131 = general; 262 = water-dispute carve-out.
🏘️ Good to Know
The Four Key Cases
- 1963 West BengalWest Bengal argued it was a sovereign entity whose land Parliament could not take. The Court rejected that sovereignty claim and allowed Parliament to acquire coal-bearing State land. Why it matters: it confirmed the States are NOT sovereign and that Article 131 can settle property-type disputes between a State and the Union.
- 1969-70 BiharBihar wanted to sue over matters involving Hindustan Steel Ltd., a Government company. The Court dropped the private company from the suit. Why it matters: this fixed Article 131’s narrow party rule — only the Union and States can litigate here, so a private company cannot be joined even if the government owns it.
- 1977 KarnatakaKarnataka sued over a Commission of Inquiry into its own Chief Minister. The Court read the phrase ‘legal right’ broadly, meaning almost any government-versus-government legal grievance can come under Article 131. But: it still dismissed Karnataka’s suit on the facts. Why it matters: the reach of the Article widened, yet it does not guarantee a win — a real grievance still needs a genuine legal right.
- 2024 KeralaKerala challenged the Union’s borrowing-limit letters as a violation of its fiscal autonomy. The Court affirmed Article 131 as a genuine constitutional right of a State to sue, and referred the fiscal question to a 5-judge Bench. Why it matters: it shows Article 131 is a live, powerful tool for Centre-State disputes, not a dead letter.
- So whatTogether the four cases trace a single progression: who can sue (Governments only), for what (a real legal right), and how far the Court will go (broadly, but not to invent rights). That is exactly the trio of facts exams test.
✅ Test Yourself
Work through a 5-question chain on Article 131, then keep practising with a random Indian Polity question.
⚡ Great to Know
How Article 131 Fits
- Original jurisdictionIt is one of the Supreme Court’s heads of original jurisdiction.
- Article 262 linkArticle 262 can bar the Court from certain interstate water disputes.
- So what131 and 262 interact over which disputes the Court can hear.
- How to recall131 = Union-State suits; 262 = water-dispute carve-out.
- Why it mattersBecause the two articles together define Court access, options that ignore the 262 exception are wrong.
🎯 Exam Angle (PYQ & MCQ Traps)
CDS I 2017: Powers of the Supreme Court
- QuestionCDS and other competitive exams ask which are the powers of the Supreme Court — including original jurisdiction in a dispute between the Government of India and one or more States under Article 131.
- WhyArticle 131 gives the SC exclusive original jurisdiction over federal disputes — a core exam point.
- LinkSource: CDS I 2017 (see Q68).
The ‘Companies Can Sue’ Trap
- Trap option‘A private company can be joined as a party to an Article 131 suit.’
- DistractorCompanies often appear in Court, so joining feels allowed.
- Fact testedOnly the Union and States can be parties; private companies cannot be joined.
- Eliminate fastIf an option joins a private company, it is wrong.
- Try this rule131 = Government-versus-Government only.
The ‘Any Dispute’ Trap
- Trap option‘Article 131 covers any dispute involving the Union or a State.’
- DistractorIt is a broad jurisdictional clause.
- Fact testedIt requires a question on which a legal right depends, and excludes pre-Constitution treaties.
- Eliminate fastIf an option gives 131 blanket coverage, it overstates.
- Try this ruleLegal-right question + Government parties only.
📰 Current Affairs
The 2024 Kerala Suit
- DevelopmentKerala sued over Union-imposed borrowing limits under Article 131.
- Why it mattersThe Court affirmed 131 as a real right and referred the fiscal question to a 5-judge Bench.
- So whatIt keeps Article 131 a live Centre-State litigation tool.
Beyond the answer
Browse all indian-polity-and-constitution topics →
📚 Keep reading
Polity0359 — Legal Services Authorities Act: Free Legal Aid EligibilityPolity0222 — Article 262: Adjudication of Inter-State River Water DisputesPolity0299 — Article 143 of the ConstitutionPolity0052 — The Supreme CourtPolity0324 — National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)❓ Practice this topic
Which of the following Acts, receiving presidential assent on 24 December 2023, replaced the Indian Telegraph Act 1885, the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1933 and the Telegraph Wires (Unlawful Possession) Act 1950?Under Article 61 of the Constitution, by what majority must the resolution preferring the charge of impeachment against the President be passed in each House of Parliament?Which Article of the Constitution provides that it shall be the endeavour of every State to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage to children belonging to linguistic minority groups?In which situation can a State Governor issue an ordinance under Article 213 of the Constitution?🎲 Take a Indian Polity And Constitution Quiz
Leave a Reply