A seven-member commission arrived in India to decide India’s constitutional future. Not one member was Indian. This article covers the Simon Commission, the protests it triggered, and India’s own constitutional answer, the Nehru Report.

Timeline
- 3 February 1928: The Simon Commission arrives in Bombay. India observes a nationwide hartal, greeting it with “Go Back, Simon” protests.
- 10 August 1928: The Nehru Committee finalises its report, demanding dominion status for India within the British Empire.
- 28-31 August 1928: The report is presented for review at the All Parties Conference in Lucknow.
- 30 October 1928: Lala Lajpat Rai is struck during a police lathi charge, while leading a silent protest against the Commission in Lahore.
- 17 November 1928: Lajpat Rai dies of his injuries, intensifying nationalist resolve against British rule.
An All-White Commission Need to Know
- The Simon Commission, led by Sir John Simon, had seven members, all British.
- No Indian was included, triggering its rejection across the political spectrum.
- Both the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League called for a complete boycott of the Commission.
- At Lucknow on 30 November 1928, Jawaharlal Nehru and Gobind Ballabh Pant were also beaten during anti-Commission protests.
- The blow Pant received in that protest left him disabled for life.
India’s Own Answer: The Nehru Report Need to Know
- The Nehru Report (1928), chaired by Motilal Nehru, was India’s first major Indian-drafted constitutional proposal.
- It demanded dominion status and a federal government structure for India.
- Lala Lajpat Rai died on 17 November 1928, from injuries sustained in a lathi charge during a Lahore protest against the Commission.
- The Nehru Report was rejected by the Muslim League, since it did not address demands for separate electorates.
- Radical nationalists also rejected it, since they wanted full independence, not dominion status.
Test Yourself
The Wider Story Great to Know
- Lajpat Rai’s death directly motivated Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, and Sukhdev. They assassinated British police officer J.P. Saunders on 17 December 1928 in revenge.
- The Simon Commission’s all-white composition directly contradicted its own stated purpose: assessing India’s readiness for self-government.
- The Nehru Report shows Indian leaders could produce a serious constitutional alternative themselves, a direct rebuttal to the colonial assumption that India needed British experts to design its own government.
- The chain from protest, to police violence, to a leader’s death, to a revenge assassination shows how colonial repression could radicalise the independence movement.
- The Muslim League’s and radical nationalists’ rejections of the Nehru Report, for opposite reasons, foreshadow the deeper splits that would keep shaping India’s path to independence.
Beyond the answer
Browse all modern-indian-history topics →
📚 Keep reading
ModHist0003 — Nehru's India: Nation-Building and Non-AlignmentGovernors-General and Viceroys of India (1773-1947)ModHist0114 — Lala Lajpat RaiLord Wellesley: The Subsidiary Alliance and the Conquest of IndiaLord Dalhousie: The Doctrine of Lapse, Railways and Annexation❓ Practice this topic
Which event completed the British conquest of Burma during Dufferin's Viceroyalty?Who was the first President of the Indian National Congress?Where was the first session of the Indian National Congress held in 1885?Who was A.O. Hume and what was his role in the founding of the Congress?🎲 Take a Modern Indian History Quiz
Leave a Reply