How far was the Industrial Revolution in England responsible for the decline of handicrafts and cottage industries in India?
1. Frame the answer
England’s Industrial Revolution was a major, but not the only, cause of India’s handicraft decline — colonial policy choices mattered just as much.
2. Machine production undercuts handicrafts
English factories could produce cloth and goods far more cheaply than Indian hand-production, directly undercutting Indian artisans on price.
3. India as a captive market
Colonial policy turned India into a captive market for British manufactured goods, rather than protecting Indian industry from this competition.
4. Asymmetric tariffs
Import duties on British goods entering India stayed low, while Indian goods entering Britain often faced real tariff barriers.
5. Reversing the trade pattern
India shifted from being a net exporter of finished textiles to becoming an importer of British cloth and an exporter of raw cotton instead.
6. Policy, not just technology
The Industrial Revolution gave Britain the technological capacity, but colonial trade and tariff policy is what let that capacity actually devastate Indian handicrafts.
7. A counter-example: railways
Railways, another product of industrial-era technology, cut both ways — they helped move British manufactures inland, but also connected Indian markets internally.
8. Weighing the “how far”
England’s Industrial Revolution was necessary but not sufficient on its own; without matching colonial trade policy, its impact on India would have been far smaller.
9. Answer structure
Explain the technological mechanism (cheap machine goods), then show how colonial policy (asymmetric tariffs, captive market status) amplified it, concluding both factors were jointly, not separately, responsible.
Leave a Reply