Consider the following pairs (International agreement/set-up — Subject):
1. Alma-Ata Declaration — Healthcare of the people
2. Hague Convention — Biological and chemical weapons
3. Talanoa Dialogue — Global climate change
4. Under2 Coalition — Child rights
Which of the pairs given above are correctly matched?A.1 and 3 onlyB.4 onlyC.2, 3 and 4 onlyD.1 and 2 only

Question

Consider the following pairs (International agreement/set-up — Subject):1. Alma-Ata Declaration — Healthcare of the people2. Hague Convention — Biological and chemical weapons3. Talanoa Dialogue — Global climate change4. Under2 Coalition — Child rightsWhich of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

1 and 3 only. 1 and 3 only is correct. Alma-Ata concerns primary health care, while Talanoa concerns global climate action.Under2 brings states and regions together on climate commitments. It is not a child-rights instrument.The Hague pairing does not identify the biological-and-chemical-weapons framework correctly. The Geneva Protocol and the later biological and chemical weapons conventions are the relevant distinctions.Earlier Hague rules did address poisoned weapons and certain gas projectiles. Do not turn the rejected pair into a claim that Hague instruments never concerned those weapons.Review the four subject matches and the Hague and weapons distinction. Read WHO and international health emergencies to connect health institutions with another international framework.

Which statement avoids a misleading conclusion about Hague instruments and chemical weapons?

Keep practicing

Beyond the answer

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Discover more from MCQ Questions