Menu

Indian Polity and Constitution Mixed Practice — MCQs with Answers (Set 23)

A mixed set of 25 Indian Polity and Constitution MCQs on smaller topics that have no set of their own. Each answer links to its topic Article.

0 / 19 correct · click an option to check it

Q1. In Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (2024), the Electoral Bonds case, how did the Court use the manifest arbitrariness doctrine?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: D

Correct: it struck down the anonymous funding scheme. The Court held the scheme unconstitutional on 15 February 2024.

Related topics: The Doctrine of Manifest Arbitrariness

Q2. What did Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) do that was new for the manifest arbitrariness doctrine?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Shayara Bano extended the manifest arbitrariness test to legislation for the first time, striking down instant triple talaq.

Related topics: The Doctrine of Manifest Arbitrariness

Q3. What did E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (1974) establish about Article 14?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

The correct answer is that arbitrariness itself is antithetical to equality. Justice Bhagwati called equality and arbitrariness sworn enemies. Memory hook: Royappa means arbitrariness.

Related topics: Right to Equality: Article 14 and the India-USA Comparison

Q4. What does the Doctrine of Manifest Arbitrariness treat as a violation of Article 14?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

The correct answer is arbitrariness itself. An arbitrary State act is unequal and can break Article 14. Memory hook: arbitrary means unequal.

Related topics: Right to Equality: Article 14 and the India-USA Comparison

Q5. What are the NHRC’s recommendations to a government, once it completes an investigation?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

The NHRC has civil-court-like powers to investigate, but cannot force any government to act on its findings.

Related topics: NHRC: India’s Human Rights Watchdog

Q6. The 2019 amendment cut the NHRC Chairperson and Members’ term of office from five years to how long?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

The same amendment also raised human-rights-knowledge Members from two to three, with at least one required to be a woman.

Related topics: NHRC: India’s Human Rights Watchdog

Q7. Before the 2019 amendment, who alone was eligible to become NHRC Chairperson?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The 2019 amendment broadened this to also include a sitting or retired Supreme Court judge.

Related topics: NHRC: India’s Human Rights Watchdog

Q8. Which body first recommended setting up a Lokpal at the Centre and Lokayuktas at the state level?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

This recommendation came decades before either the 2011 movement or the 2013 Act that eventually created the Lokpal.

Related topics: Lokpal: India’s Anti-Corruption Ombudsman

Q9. Under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, what share of the Lokpal’s Members must be judicial members?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

At least 50% of Members must also come from SC, ST, OBC, minority, or women backgrounds.

Related topics: Lokpal: India’s Anti-Corruption Ombudsman

Q10. What specifically delayed the Lokpal’s first Chairperson from 2014 to 2019?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Without a Leader of Opposition, the Lokpal’s own selection committee could not function, until a 2016 amendment fixed this.

Related topics: Lokpal: India’s Anti-Corruption Ombudsman

Q11. Who became India’s first Lokpal Chairperson, in March 2019?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

The correct answer is Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose. He is a former Supreme Court judge. He was named Chairperson of the first Lokpal in March 2019, five years after the Act was notified.

Related topics: Lokpal: India’s Anti-Corruption Ombudsman

Q12. In Siba Shankar Das v. State of Odisha (2024), why did the Supreme Court strike down a bail condition?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: D

The Court held that a bail condition banning political activity was invalid, since it effectively forced the accused to waive a Fundamental Right.

Related topics: Waiver of Fundamental Rights

Q13. Which case first debated the question of waiving Fundamental Rights, ahead of the 1959 ruling?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

Behram Khurshid Pesikaka v. State of Bombay (1954) first raised the waiver question, with one judge floating a possible individual-benefit exception later rejected.

Related topics: Waiver of Fundamental Rights

Q14. What did the 5-judge Constitution Bench decide in Basheshar Nath v. Commissioner of Income Tax (1959)?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

The Bench settled the question decisively: Fundamental Rights cannot be waived, a deliberate departure from the American constitutional tradition.

Related topics: Waiver of Fundamental Rights

Q15. Which amendment added the Fundamental Duties to the Constitution, and in what year?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

The 42nd Amendment, 1976, added the Fundamental Duties, based on the Swaran Singh Committee’s recommendations during the Emergency.

Related topics: Fundamental or basic script of the ‘Rigveda’ was

Q16. Which one of these is not a Fundamental Duty?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: D

Abolition of titles (Article 18) is a constitutional provision related to equality, not one of the 11 Fundamental Duties listed under Article 51A.

Q17. Which of the following were members of the Swaran Singh Committees (1976)? I. AR Antulay II. SS Ray III. Haridev Joshi IV. CM Stephen Select the correct answer using the codes given below. [RAS/RTS 2018] Codes

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The Swaran Singh Committee (1976) included members such as A R Antulay, S S Ray, and Haridev Joshi among others tasked with recommending constitutional amendments including the Fundamental Duties.

Q18. What is the main test the Election Commission applied in both the Shiv Sena and NCP symbol disputes?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The EC applied a ‘legislative majority’ test in both cases, looking at which faction commanded more elected MLAs and MPs.

Related topics: Which one of the following rulers of Magadha was the contemporary of Alexander the great?

Q19. The Administrative Tribunals Act was amended in which year, to bring it in line with the L. Chandra Kumar ruling?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The Act was amended in 2006 to align with the Supreme Court’s L. Chandra Kumar ruling.

Related topics: Which of the following is a Harappan port?

Beyond the answer

    Leave a Reply

    ✨Ask doubt
    ✨ Ask a Question AI×