Menu

Article 265 of the Constitution

No tax without a law. That is Article 265 in five words. The State cannot take your money unless a valid law allows it. It is one short line. Yet it is the base of the whole tax system, and the first clause lawyers check in any dispute over a levy.

Part XII Where Article 265 sits.
1215 Magna Carta limits the king’s power to tax.
2 steps Levy and collection both need law.
4 parts Of a tax law, per Govind Saran (1985).

Levy: Creating the charge: the law says the tax exists and who pays.

Collection: Actually taking the money.

Authority of law: A valid law made by the right legislature.

Seventh Schedule: Divides law-making subjects between Union and States.

1Chapter 1: The One-Line Guarantee

Must Know

The text

  • Article 265 reads: “No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law.”
  • It sits in Part XII, the chapter on Finance, Property, Contracts and Suits.
  • If no law backs a tax, the tax is illegal.
  • The government must first pass a law. Only then can it tax you.

Two steps, both need law

  • Levy means creating the charge.
  • Collection means taking the money.
  • Article 265 covers both.
  • You cannot collect a tax that was never lawfully levied.
  • A void levy cannot be saved at the collection stage.
  • Every rupee collected under a void levy is unlawful.

What counts as “authority of law”

  • First, the right legislature must make the law.
  • A tax on a Union List subject needs a Union law.
  • A State List tax needs a State law.
  • If the wrong body taxes you, the tax is illegal.
  • Second, the law itself must be constitutional.
  • A law that breaks the Constitution cannot support a tax.
  • Third, a government order or notice alone is not enough.
  • Rules made under a valid Act can work, but the Act itself must authorise them.

Remember: Article 265: no tax without law. It covers levy and collection.

True or False: A government order alone is enough authority to collect a tax.

True or False: Article 265 covers only the levy, not the collection.

2Chapter 2: What a Tax Law Must Contain

Good to Know

Govind Saran (1985)

  • In Govind Saran Ganga Saran v. Commissioner of Sales Tax (1985), the Supreme Court listed the parts of a tax.
  • There are four: the taxable event, the person liable, the rate, and the measure of value.
  • If these are unclear, it is hard to say a levy exists in law.
  • The rank of the collecting officer is not one of the four parts.

Remember: Four parts: event, person, rate, measure.

Links to Articles 266 and 267

  • Article 266 creates the Consolidated Fund of India and of each State.
  • Tax money collected under a valid law goes into this fund.
  • Money can leave the fund only with Parliament’s approval, except for charged expenditure.
  • Article 267 creates the Contingency Fund, for urgent and unforeseen spending.

Where Article 265 fits in the tax system

  • The Seventh Schedule divides subjects between the Union, State and Concurrent lists.
  • Article 265 makes sure a matching valid law exists.
  • GST works through Articles 246A, 269A and 279A.
  • Even so, each GST levy still needs a valid law behind it.
  • Entry taxes, cesses and surcharges keep getting challenged in court.
  • The usual question is simple: is there a valid law behind this levy?
  • Read more: Article 246A: Special Provision for GST Law-Making Power and Article 269A: IGST Levy and Apportionment.

True or False: The rank of the collecting officer is not one of the four parts of a tax law.

3Chapter 3: The Story Behind the Shield

Great to Know

From Magna Carta to the Constitution

  • The idea is very old.
  • Magna Carta (1215) limited the king’s power to tax without consent.
  • In 1950, the framers turned the principle into a written rule.
  • “No taxation without law” became a constitutional command, not just a slogan.
  • It is why governments pass tax Acts instead of collecting on their own.

In practice today

True or False: Article 265 is the constitutional basis for the principle “no taxation without law”.

4Chapter 4: Exam Traps

Great to Know

How it is asked

  • Exams rarely test the clause alone.
  • They fold it into questions on GST, cesses and State taxes.
  • If an option says a tax can be collected without a law, it is wrong.
  • If an option says a government order alone is enough, it is wrong.
  • Taxes on agricultural income are a State subject, so the matching law must be a State law.

5Previous Year Questions

Exam angle: real questions on this topic.

CDS II 2017, Q51

A question on the GST Bill. Every levy, including GST, must trace to authority of law under Article 265. See the question.

CDS II 2021, Q73

Taxes on agricultural income are a State subject. Competence to tax follows the Seventh Schedule, and Article 265 needs the matching law. See the question.

Quick Q&A

  • Article 265 says? No tax without authority of law.
  • Which Part? Part XII.
  • Magna Carta year? 1215.
  • Govind Saran year? 1985.
  • Article 267? Contingency Fund.

MCQ on Article 265

Question 1 of 1

Article 265 of the Constitution states which core rule?

Question 1 of 1

Article 265 sits in which Part of the Constitution?

Question 1 of 1

The 1985 case “Govind Saran Ganga Saran v. Commissioner of Sales Tax” set out a 4-part test for a valid tax.

Which of these is NOT one of the 4 parts?

Question 1 of 1

Which Article sets up the Consolidated Fund of India and of each State?

Answered 0 of 4 checks.

Was this helpful?

Beyond the answer

    Leave a Reply

    [privacy-do-not-sell-link]

    Discover more from MCQ Questions

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading

    ✨Ask doubt
    ✨ Ask a Question AI×
    [privacy-do-not-sell-link]