Parliament is not in session, but the country needs a law right now. Article 123 lets the President step in and legislate by ordinance. It has the same force as an Act, but it lapses within six weeks of Parliament reassembling. This lesson covers the conditions, the limits, and the long fight over re-promulgation.
Ordinance: Executive law with the force of an Act.
Re-promulgation: Reissuing a lapsed ordinance.
Laying: Placing it before both Houses.
Reassembly: Parliament meeting again after a break.
1Chapter 1: The Conditions for an Ordinance
Must Know
The text, in plain words
- Article 123(1) says the President may promulgate an ordinance only when both Houses are not in session.
- The President must be satisfied that circumstances make immediate action necessary.
- In practice, the Union Cabinet gives that advice.
- An ordinance has the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament.
- Every ordinance must be laid before both Houses when Parliament reassembles.
The trap
- If even one House is in session, the President cannot promulgate an ordinance.
- The power exists only when both are out of session.
Remember: Satisfaction + both Houses out of session + laying before Parliament = the three pillars.
True or False: The President can promulgate an ordinance while the Rajya Sabha is in session, if the Lok Sabha is not.
2Chapter 2: How an Ordinance Dies
Must Know
Three ways out
- It ceases to operate six weeks after Parliament reassembles.
- If both Houses pass resolutions disapproving it, it dies when the second resolution passes.
- The President can also withdraw it at any time.
What stays valid
- Everything done under the ordinance before it lapsed remains valid.
The competence limit
- Article 123(3): an ordinance cannot make any provision Parliament could not itself enact.
- If it does, that provision is void.
- So an ordinance is a temporary law, not a permanent one.
- Parliament must convert it into an Act to keep it alive.
True or False: An ordinance lapses six weeks after Parliament reassembles, unless converted into an Act.
3Chapter 3: Ordinance vs Act
Good to Know
Same force, different life
- Force: for the time it lives, an ordinance has the same force as a parliamentary law.
- Life: an Act is permanent. An ordinance dies automatically, six weeks after reassembly, unless re-enacted.
- Judicial review: courts can examine whether the ordinance was within the President’s competence and the Constitution.
- An ordinance can amend laws Parliament could amend.
- Read more: Article 85: Sessions of Parliament and Legislative Procedure in Parliament.
True or False: An ordinance can amend a law that Parliament could amend, but it lapses unless converted.
4Chapter 4: The Story of Re-promulgation
Great to Know
A power built for emergencies
- In 1950, the ordinance power was carried over from the Government of India Act, 1935.
- Its purpose was genuine emergencies between sessions.
D.C. Wadhwa, 1987
- Bihar had re-promulgated the same ordinances again and again, for years.
- The Supreme Court struck this down as a fraud on the Constitution.
- This case concerned the Governor’s ordinance power under Article 213.
- Read more: Article 213: Governor’s Ordinance Power and The Governor: Office, Powers and Immunities.
Krishna Kumar Singh, 2017
- A seven-judge bench held that re-promulgation is a constitutional fraud.
- The exception is when the ordinance is placed before the legislature.
- Re-promulgation bypasses parliamentary scrutiny.
- So courts treat it as a fraud unless the legislature is genuinely unable to meet.
The pattern
- A power meant for emergencies became a habit.
- The courts keep pulling it back to its constitutional bounds.
Think it through: Think it through: why is re-promulgation a “fraud”?
An ordinance is meant to last only until the legislature can act on it. Reissuing it again and again lets the executive make law without ever facing the legislature. That defeats the whole point of the six-week limit.
True or False: D.C. Wadhwa related to the President’s ordinance power under Article 123.
5Chapter 5: Past Papers
Exam Point of View
CAPF 2020: statements on ordinances
- The question asked which statements about promulgating ordinances are correct.
- The correct ones track Article 123: both Houses out of session, satisfaction of immediate need, and laying before Parliament.
- (Source: CAPF AC 2020, Q83.)
CAPF 2022: the D.C. Wadhwa case
- The question asked which power the D.C. Wadhwa case relates to.
- The answer is the Governor’s ordinance power (Article 213) and re-promulgation.
- Wadhwa struck down repeated re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval.
- (Source: CAPF AC 2022, Q65.)
UPSC 2025: ordinance statements
- The question asked which statements about ordinances are correct, including whether an ordinance can amend an Act.
- An ordinance can amend laws Parliament could amend, but it lapses unless converted.
- Statements denying either half are traps.
- (Source: UPSC CSP 2025, Q51.)
True or False: Wadhwa struck down repeated re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval.
6Chapter 6: Ordinances in the News
Current Affairs
Between sessions
- From land laws to service rules, ordinances keep appearing between sessions.
- Governments have used them for electoral reforms and land laws.
- Each must be converted into an Act within six weeks of reassembly.
- Article 123 is the constitutional clock that starts ticking the moment an ordinance is signed.
Quick Q&A
- Which article? 123.
- Lapses after? Six weeks from reassembly.
- Who can promulgate? The President.
- Wadhwa year? 1987.
- Krishna Kumar Singh year? 2017.
MCQ on Article 123
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Answered 0 of 5 checks.
Leave a Reply