14,988+ Questions · 21 Subjects · Free to Practice

The National Green Tribunal: A Court Just for the Environment

India was only the third country to build a dedicated environmental court. This article covers the National Green Tribunal, its powers, and its real limits.

mcqquestion.com A Court Just for the Environment
Polity0118
18 OCT 2010
NGT Established
India’s first dedicated environmental court, under the NGT Act
2012
POSCO Case
Suspends environmental clearance for the Odisha steel project
2012
Almitra Patel Case
Bans open burning of waste on land, including landfills
2019
Overturns an NGT order in the Sterlite case, on jurisdiction
The takeaway: the NGT has real teeth, but the Supreme Court still has the final word.
⬇ Download as image
📑 Contents

Timeline

  • 18 October 2010: The National Green Tribunal was established under the NGT Act. India became the third country worldwide, and the first developing nation, with a dedicated environmental court.
  • 2012: In the POSCO Steel Project case, the NGT suspended the environmental clearance granted to a major steel project in Odisha.
  • 2012: In the Almitra Patel case, the NGT banned open burning of waste on land, including landfills, across India.
  • 2019: The Supreme Court overturned an NGT order in the Sterlite Copper case. It ruled the NGT lacked jurisdiction to order the plant’s reopening.

Must Know

🏛️ Must Know
What the NGT Is
  • Established The National Green Tribunal (NGT) was established on 18 October 2010, under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 — an Act of Parliament, not an executive order.
  • Bench Structure The NGT has a Principal Bench in Delhi, with four zonal benches in Bhopal, Pune, Kolkata, and Chennai.
  • Members Its members include a chairperson, judicial members (retired Supreme Court or High Court judges), and expert members with environmental science or policy backgrounds.
  • Powers The NGT holds powers of a civil court. It can award compensation, order ecological restitution, and enforce environmental laws directly.
  • Principles It applies core environmental principles when deciding cases: sustainable development, the precautionary principle, and the polluter-pays principle.

Good to Know

📘 Good to Know
Related Institutions
NGT vs the Central Pollution Control Board
  • Both Created By Statute The NGT and the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) were both created by Acts of Parliament, not executive orders. The NGT came from the NGT Act, 2010; the CPCB came from the Water Act, 1974.
  • Different Jobs The NGT provides environmental justice and reduces the litigation burden on higher courts. The CPCB, by contrast, promotes clean water bodies and works to improve air quality nationwide.
  • How They Connect The two aren’t parent and child bodies. The CPCB feeds the NGT technical data and monitoring reports as an expert body. See EnvEco0052 — Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) for how the CPCB itself works.
📝 Previous Year Questions
UPSC CSP 2018 — How the NGT Differs From the CPCB
  • UPSC 2018 Only the statement describing each body’s actual job is correct. Both the NGT and CPCB were created by Acts of Parliament, not one by executive order, so that statement is false. See UPSC CSP 2018 GS Paper I, Q4. View this question.

Test Yourself

1. On 18 October 2010, India became the third country worldwide, and the first developing nation, to establish what?

 

Great to Know

🌟 Great to Know
A Real Check, and a Bold First Step
  • A Bold First Step Being the first developing country with a dedicated environmental court was a bold step. Most nations with such courts at the time were wealthier, with more established environmental-law traditions.
  • Not the Final Word The Sterlite ruling shows a real check on the NGT’s power. Its orders can still be challenged and overturned by the Supreme Court, so it isn’t the final word on environmental disputes.
  • Applying Principles Directly Applying the polluter-pays and precautionary principles directly, rather than leaving them as abstract policy language, gives the NGT teeth that older regulatory bodies often lacked.
  • Zonal Benches Matter Zonal benches beyond Delhi matter practically. Litigants pursuing environmental cases don’t have to travel to the capital for every dispute, which lowers a real barrier to access.

Beyond the answer

    Leave a Reply

    Discover more from MCQ Questions

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading