A 1995 law just got a new name: UMEED, meaning “expectations.” Months later, the Supreme Court paused some of its most contested provisions. This lesson covers the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, and the ongoing legal fight over it.
Waqf: Permanent religious or charitable gift under Islamic law.
Waqf by user: Property treated as waqf through long use.
JPC: Joint Parliamentary Committee.
UMEED: Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development.
1Chapter 1: The Act and Its New Name
Must Know
From Bill to law
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2024 | The Waqf (Amendment) Bill is introduced and referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC). |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Lok Sabha debate; the Bill passes. |
| 5 Apr 2025 | Presidential assent. The Waqf Act, 1995 is renamed the UMEED Act. |
| 15 Sep 2025 | The Supreme Court stays key provisions in an interim order, but not the whole Act. |
- UMEED stands for Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development.
- “UMEED” means “expectations.” It is a deliberate naming choice, framing the reform as better governance and transparency.
- The Act passed Lok Sabha 288-232 and Rajya Sabha 128-95, after the JPC reviewed the 2024 bill.
Remember: Assent 5 Apr 2025. LS 288-232. RS 128-95. SC stay 15 Sep 2025.
True or False: The Waqf Act, 1995 was renamed the UMEED Act by the 2025 amendment.
2Chapter 2: What Is a Waqf?
Good to Know
The idea
- A waqf is a permanent religious or charitable gift under Islamic law.
- Once someone dedicates property this way, it can never be sold or taken back.
How old is it?
- India’s earliest documented waqf goes back to 1185 CE.
- Sultan Muhammad Ghori donated two villages to the Jama Masjid of Multan.
- Delhi’s Hazrat Nizamuddin Dargah, a shrine completed in 1325, is still Delhi Waqf Board property.
- So the same basic idea has run for about seven centuries.
Scale
- Official government data puts registered waqf land at 8,72,328 properties, covering about 38.16 lakh acres, across 32 state boards. (Source: PIB.)
True or False: A waqf property can be sold back by the donor.
3Chapter 3: The Disputed Provisions
Must Know
Three provisions draw most fire
- A requirement of 5 years of demonstrable Islamic practice to create a waqf.
- Adding non-Muslim members to Waqf Councils and Boards.
- Allowing properties long declared “waqf by user” to be denotified.
Other changes
- The Central Waqf Council must now include 2 women members and 2 non-Muslim members.
- The Act introduces new definitions for “Aghakhani waqf” and “Bohra waqf”, recognising community-dedicated waqfs.
Why “waqf by user” matters
- It covers properties treated as waqf for generations through long religious use, not formal deeds.
- Removing that recognition can unsettle established religious sites.
- This sits at the meeting point of religious property administration and state regulatory power.
- Read more: Article 26: Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs, Article 29 and Right to Property: Article 300A.
True or False: “Waqf by user” covers properties treated as waqf through long use, without formal deeds.
4Chapter 4: In Parliament and in Court
Current Affairs
On the floor
- On 2 April 2025, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi tore up a copy of the bill in the Lok Sabha.
- He said: “Like Gandhi, I am also tearing up this law. This is unconstitutional.”
- Home Minister Amit Shah replied that the opposition was trying to scare people. (Source: India TV News.)
- Opposition members walked out of the Rajya Sabha vote too.
- Their complaint: their dissent notes were left out of the JPC’s final report.
The Supreme Court’s interim order
- On 15 September 2025, the Supreme Court stayed key provisions.
- One of them let an officer’s report decide whether a property counts as waqf.
- It refused to stay the Act as a whole.
- Nearly 72 petitions challenged the Act. Petitioners included AIMIM’s Asaduddin Owaisi, AIMPLB, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, DMK and Congress MPs.
- The case has sat at this interim stage for nearly a year.
- The Court’s approach is a common one: pause the most legally shaky parts pending full hearing, without blocking the entire reform.
True or False: The Supreme Court stayed the whole Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.
Think it through: Think it through: why pause only some parts?
Staying the whole law would block every reform in it, including uncontroversial ones. Pausing only the shakiest parts protects people from harm now, without deciding the full case early.
5Chapter 5: First Tests on the Ground
Current Affairs
Kerala
- On 15 July 2026, the Kerala High Court found that the state Waqf Board’s makeup broke the Act’s Section 14 rule.
- It lacked the two mandatory non-Muslim members, and had inadequate Shia representation.
- The High Court restrained the Board from major policy and capital decisions. It put the Board under a government official’s supervision.
- On appeal, the Supreme Court removed the official-supervision part on 21 July 2026. It kept the restraint on major decisions. (Source: LiveLaw.)
- It sent the matter back to Kerala High Court for an expedited final hearing. (Source: Bar and Bench.)
- This is the first real test of the non-Muslim-members rule on the ground.
Uttar Pradesh
- Under the Act’s registration mandate, UP’s Sunni and Shia Waqf Boards had rejected 29,747 and 2,059 registrations as of 7 June 2026.
- Roughly 118,302 properties had been uploaded to the UMEED portal in total.
- Most rejections came from mismatches with revenue records, like khasra numbers and land area.
- Rejected properties now go to the Waqf Tribunal for a final decision. (Source: ETV Bharat.)
The records gap
- The UMEED portal shows only around 5.17 lakh properties so far.
- Roughly 3.55 lakh properties are unaccounted for. (Source: Kashmir Times.)
- Critics of the old system say patchy record-keeping is what the reform should fix.
- Critics of the reform fear the gap will be used against genuine waqfs.
- The final outcome depends on the Supreme Court’s full hearing.
- Read more: Uniform Civil Code: The Uttarakhand Model.
True or False: The Kerala Waqf Board case is the first test of the non-Muslim-members rule on the ground.
Quick Q&A
- Assent date? 5 April 2025.
- LS vote? 288-232.
- Petitions challenging? About 72.
- SC interim stay? 15 September 2025.
- Earliest documented waqf? 1185 CE.
MCQ on Waqf Amendment Act
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Question 1 of 1
Answered 0 of 5 checks.
Leave a Reply