A 1995 law just got a new name: UMEED, meaning “expectations.” Months later, the Supreme Court paused some of its most contested provisions. This article covers the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, and the ongoing legal fight over it.
Timeline
- 2024: The Waqf (Amendment) Bill is introduced and referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).
- 5 April 2025: The President gives assent. The Waqf Act, 1995 is renamed the UMEED Act.
- 15 September 2025: The Supreme Court stays key contested provisions in an interim order, without staying the Act itself.
- Ongoing: Around 72 petitions challenging the Act await final adjudication in Waqf Tribunals and higher courts.
Must Know
- The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 received Presidential assent on 5 April 2025, renaming the Waqf Act, 1995 as the UMEED Act (Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act).
- The Act passed Lok Sabha 288-232 and Rajya Sabha 128-95, after a Joint Parliamentary Committee reviewed the original 2024 bill.
- On 15 September 2025, the Supreme Court stayed key provisions — including one letting an officer’s report decide if a property counts as waqf — while refusing to stay the Act as a whole.
- Nearly 72 petitions challenged the Act, including from AIMIM’s Asaduddin Owaisi, AIMPLB, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, DMK, and Congress MPs.
Good to Know
- Disputed provisions include: requiring 5 years of demonstrable Islamic practice to create a waqf, adding non-Muslim members to the Central Waqf Council and State Waqf Boards, and allowing denotification of properties long declared “waqf by user.”
- The Central Waqf Council must now compulsorily include 2 women members and 2 non-Muslim members.
- The Act introduces new definitions for “Aghakhani waqf” and “Bohra waqf,” recognising specific community-dedicated waqfs.
- “UMEED” means “expectations” — a deliberate naming choice framing the reform as improving governance and transparency.
Test Yourself
Great to Know
- The Supreme Court’s approach — staying specific provisions while letting the Act stand overall — reflects a common judicial strategy: pause the most legally shaky parts pending full hearing, without blocking the entire reform.
- The “waqf by user” provision is especially contested because it affects properties treated as waqf for generations through long-term religious use, not formal deeds. Removing that recognition can unsettle established religious sites.
- This debate sits at the intersection of religious property administration and state regulatory power, a recurring tension in how India governs minority religious institutions.
- The final outcome depends on the Supreme Court’s full hearing, not just this interim stay — the law’s ultimate shape is still being decided as of 2026.
Beyond the answer
Browse all indian-polity-and-constitution topics →
📚 Keep reading
Polity0052 — The Supreme CourtPolity0029 — The Judiciary: Structure and Judicial AppointmentsUPSC CSP 2025 — General Studies Paper I (Full Question Paper)Polity0375 — Women in the Higher Judiciary: Representation and the Road AheadPolity0019 — Centre-State Relations and the Federal Structure❓ Practice this topic
Q5: What is PESA's core purpose?Q4: Why does force alone fail to end left-wing extremism long-term?Q3: What does the Tribes Advisory Council do under the Fifth Schedule?Q2: Which Schedule of the Constitution governs Scheduled Areas administration?🎲 Take a Indian Polity And Constitution Quiz
Leave a Reply