The Suez Crisis, 1956: The End of Old Empires

Why did Nasser nationalise the Suez Canal?

Egypt’s President Nasser took over the Suez Canal in 1956, putting the government in charge instead of its British-French owner.

Egypt’s President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal in 1956. “Nationalise” means the government takes over something a private company used to run. Egypt took the canal from its British-French operating company, the Suez Canal Company.

The canal was a hugely important shipping route. Ships carrying oil from the Middle East to Europe used it every day. Losing control of it hurt Britain and France badly. It cut off one of their most important trade links.

Source: standard record of Nasser’s 1956 Suez Canal nationalisation.

How did the invasion and secret plan actually unfold?

Israel invaded Sinai first, under a secret plan. Then Britain and France gave Egypt a final warning and sent in their own troops days later.

Britain, France, and Israel launched a joint military attack on Egypt later that year, in late October and early November 1956. Their military campaign had a code name, Operation Musketeer.

Israel invaded the Sinai Peninsula first, on 29 October 1956. Britain and France then issued an ultimatum, a final warning demanding both sides stop fighting or face attack. They landed their own troops days later. All three countries had secretly agreed to this plan beforehand.

Source: standard record of Operation Musketeer, October-November 1956.

How did the US and USSR force a withdrawal?

Both superpowers pushed back hard, and US President Eisenhower squeezed Britain financially until it agreed to stop fighting.

Both the United States and the Soviet Union pressured the attacking powers to pull out. US President Eisenhower also let investors keep selling off the British pound, driving its value down. He refused to give Britain financial help from the IMF until it agreed to a ceasefire, a formal stop to the fighting.

Britain, France, and Israel were forced to withdraw. Egypt kept control of the canal.

Source: standard record of US and Soviet pressure that ended the 1956 invasion.

What did the crisis actually change?

The crisis badly damaged Britain and France’s reputation, showed that big world decisions now needed Washington or Moscow’s okay, and led to the UN’s first major peacekeeping mission.

The crisis badly damaged Britain and France’s standing in the world. It exposed them as no longer top-tier powers that could act alone.

It showed that major world decisions now needed at least the tolerance, or acceptance, of Washington and Moscow. London and Paris could no longer decide big things on their own.

United Nations peacekeeping forces were sent in afterward. This was one of the UN’s first major peacekeeping missions. The force, called UNEF, physically kept Egyptian and Israeli troops apart along the border.

The US opposed the invasion, but it still cared about the canal’s importance. Eisenhower pushed instead for a negotiated solution, one reached through talks rather than force. He saw the invasion as a reckless shortcut, a risky move that could push Egypt closer to the Soviet Union.

Source: standard record of UNEF’s deployment and the crisis’s effect on British and French standing.

How did Nasser and Lester Pearson come out of this?

Nasser became a hero across the Arab world, while Canadian diplomat Lester Pearson won a Nobel Peace Prize for his UN peacekeeping idea.

Nasser came out of the crisis as a hero across much of the Arab world and other recently freed colonies. He had stood up to two former colonial powers and won. He was a founding figure of the Non-Aligned Movement, a group of countries that refused to side with either the US or the Soviet Union. He founded it alongside India’s Nehru and Yugoslavia’s Tito.

The episode raised the standing of newly independent countries. It showed them taking control of their own resources, instead of accepting old arrangements set up during colonial rule.

Canadian diplomat Lester Pearson won the Nobel Peace Prize for proposing the UN peacekeeping solution. Other conflicts later copied this same idea.

The crisis happened at the same time as the Soviet invasion of Hungary. That drew attention away from Suez in Western news at the time. Moscow crushed Hungary’s uprising in that same November, right alongside the Suez withdrawal.

Source: standard record of Nasser’s post-crisis standing and Lester Pearson’s 1957 Nobel Peace Prize.

Is the canal’s strategic value still contested today?

In June 2026, the Suez Canal’s income rose 23% to $4.67 billion, a partial recovery after Houthi attacks caused a sharp drop from its 2023 record.

On 28 June 2026, Suez Canal Authority Chairman Ossama Rabie announced income of $4.67 billion for the 2025/2026 year. That was a 23% rise. He credited calmer regional relations, including less conflict between Iran and the US.

Canal income had fallen to $3.9 billion in 2024. Houthi rebels had attacked Red Sea shipping during Israel’s military operations in Gaza, scaring ships away from the route. That was down from a record $9.4 billion in 2023. The 2026 figure is only a partial recovery. It has not returned to that 2023 record.

The same canal Nasser took over in 1956 is still, nearly 70 years later, a critical narrow passage that ships depend on. Its income still rises and falls with conflicts in the wider region.

Source: Egyptian Streets, 28 June 2026; standard record of 2023-24 Red Sea shipping disruptions.

Exam Angle: The Usual Traps Here

Trap 1: three countries invaded Egypt: Britain, France, and Israel. But it was the US and USSR, not the UN, that forced the withdrawal. Don’t give the UN credit for stopping the invasion itself. Its peacekeeping force only arrived after the ceasefire.

Trap 2: Suez and the Soviet invasion of Hungary both happened in November 1956. A question may test this overlap, or ask which crisis a specific fact belongs to.

Trap 3: Lester Pearson’s Nobel Peace Prize is a specific, testable fact. He won it for proposing the UN peacekeeping force (UNEF), not for the ceasefire itself.

Source: standard exam-pattern guidance for the Suez Crisis.

Check your understanding

Answer the six checks above. You will see each explanation after choosing.

Reset the checks

Primary sources

• Standard record of the 1956 Suez Crisis.
• Egyptian Streets, 28 June 2026.

Related reading

• All World History Articles
• IntlRel0026 — United Nations: Founding, Charter and Purposes — the institution whose first major peacekeeping deployment followed this crisis.
• IntlRel0059 — The Non-Aligned Movement — the movement Nasser helped found, alongside Nehru and Tito.
• WorldHist0002 — The Cold War and the Berlin Wall — the wider superpower rivalry this crisis played out within.

Practice what you learned

Random practice question →