Menu

The Supreme Court — MCQs with Answers (Set 5)

The Supreme Court sits at the very top of India’s judicial system. It began in 1950 with just eight judges. Today it has thirty-eight. But its central job has never changed. It is the final court of appeal, and the guardian of the Constitution.

Read the Article: The Supreme Court →

0 / 23 correct · click an option to check it

Q1. In August 2026, Parliament passed a law replacing an earlier presidential ordinance to raise the Supreme Court’s sanctioned strength. What did this change the total number of judges, including the Chief Justice, from and to?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, passed by the Rajya Sabha on 4 August 2026, raised the Court’s sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges (a Chief Justice plus 37 others, up from 33). It replaced an ordinance the President had promulgated on 16 May 2026. The 2019 increase, by contrast, had raised the strength from 31 to 34.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q2. Under Article 141 of the Constitution, what is the status of a Supreme Court judgment?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Article 141 makes the law declared by the Supreme Court binding on all courts within the territory of India, not just the parties to a case. This is what gives Supreme Court judgments precedent-setting force nationwide.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · High Courts and Subordinate Courts

Q3. Which of these is NOT one of the Supreme Court’s constitutionally recognised types of jurisdiction?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: D

The Supreme Court exercises original jurisdiction (enforcing fundamental rights and settling federal disputes), appellate jurisdiction (hearing appeals from High Courts and tribunals), and advisory jurisdiction (giving opinions on questions the President refers under Article 143). There is no separate “executive jurisdiction” — that power belongs to the executive branch, not the judiciary.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q4. How many judges did the Supreme Court have when it was first established, under the original Constitution?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The original Constitution of 1950 provided for a Chief Justice and 7 puisne judges, a total of 8. Parliament has raised this repeatedly since: to 11 in 1956, 14 in 1960, 18 in 1978, 26 in 1986, 31 in 2009, and 34 in 2019.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Judges of the Supreme Court of India

Q5. On which date was the Supreme Court of India established?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

The Supreme Court held its first sitting on 28 January 1950, two days after the Constitution came into force on 26 January 1950. It replaced the Federal Court of India, and initially sat in the Chamber of Princes in the old Parliament building.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q6. Consider these two statements about the L. Chandra Kumar case (1997). Statement 1: The Supreme Court ruled that CAT decisions could be appealed to High Courts. Statement 2: It reaffirmed that High Court oversight of tribunals is part of the Constitution’s basic structure. Which statement(s) is/are correct?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: D

Both are correct. The ruling restored High Court appeals over CAT decisions, and reaffirmed judicial review as part of the basic structure.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q7. In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), the Supreme Court held that tribunal decisions are subject to High Court review before which bench?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

The Court held that decisions of tribunals under Articles 323A and 323B are subject to the High Court’s writ power under Articles 226 and 227. These are heard by a Division Bench. The exclusion clauses were struck down only to the extent they shut out the High Courts and the Supreme Court.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Judges of the Supreme Court of India · Parliamentary Committees in India · High Courts and Subordinate Courts

Q8. On 2 August 2024, how did the Supreme Court rule on confiscating funds already received under the struck-down scheme?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: D

Correct: it refused to order confiscation. The Court dismissed the plea on 2 August 2024. It said the petitioner had other remedies, such as criminal procedure or Article 226.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · The Consolidated Fund of India

Q9. Which constitutional right did the Supreme Court say the Electoral Bonds Scheme violated?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Correct: the right to information under Article 19(1)(a). The Court said funding information is essential for voters to choose well, so anonymous bonds violated that right.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Right to Property: Article 300A and Its Constitutional Journey · Right to Equality: Article 14 and the India-USA Comparison · Article 32 of the Constitution

Q10. On 15 February 2024, how did the Supreme Court rule on the Electoral Bonds Scheme, 2018?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Correct: it unanimously struck down the scheme as unconstitutional. The five-judge bench was unanimous. The Chief Justice wrote the lead judgment and Justice Khanna concurred separately.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q11. In the 2025 Vineeta Srinandan case, what did the Supreme Court do regarding a Bombay High Court contempt conviction over a ‘dog mafia’ remark?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Correct: it set aside the contempt order. In December 2025 the Supreme Court held that contempt power is not a personal armour for judges. It noted the woman had shown unconditional remorse at the earliest stage.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Contempt of Court: Law and Debates

Q12. Which Article of the Constitution makes the Supreme Court a ‘Court of Record’ with inherent power to punish for contempt of itself?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Correct: Article 129. It makes the Supreme Court a court of record with power to punish contempt of itself. Article 215 gives High Courts the same power.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Article 244 of the Constitution · Article 355 of the Constitution · Article 131 of the Constitution

Q13. Which writ is issued by a High Court or the Supreme Court when a lower court or tribunal is found to have exceeded its jurisdiction in deciding a case?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The writ of Certiorari is issued to quash an order of a lower court or tribunal that has acted beyond its jurisdiction, or in violation of natural justice.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · High Courts and Subordinate Courts

Q14. Article 348 of the Constitution deals with the language requirement that all proceedings in the Supreme Court of India shall be conducted in?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Article 348 requires that all proceedings in the Supreme Court, and in every High Court, shall be conducted in the English language, unless Parliament provides otherwise.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q15. Which Constitutional Amendment inserted the provision that Parliament may by law determine the age of a Supreme Court Judge in case of a dispute over their exact age?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

The 15th Constitutional Amendment inserted the provision empowering Parliament to determine, by law, the authority and procedure for deciding a Supreme Court Judge’s age.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q16. Judgements of the Supreme Court of India, under Article 141, are binding on?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Article 141 provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts throughout the territory of India.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q17. Under which Article of the Constitution does the Supreme Court exercise its Appellate Jurisdiction over civil, criminal and constitutional matters decided by lower courts?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Articles 132 to 136 collectively provide for the Supreme Court’s Appellate Jurisdiction, covering constitutional, civil, and criminal appeals from lower courts.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Article 143 of the Constitution · Article 131 of the Constitution

Q18. In which country did the concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) originally develop before being adapted in India?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The concept of Public Interest Litigation, allowing courts to be approached on behalf of disadvantaged groups, originally developed in the United States before India adapted it.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q19. The doctrine that Fundamental Rights protected under Article 20 and Article 21 cannot be suspended even during a National Emergency was significantly shaped by which later correction to an earlier Emergency-era ruling?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

After the widely criticised ADM Jabalpur ruling permitted suspension of these rights during the Emergency, the 44th Amendment ensured Articles 20 and 21 can never be suspended even during a National Emergency.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q20. Judicial Review, as a constitutional function of the Indian judiciary, most precisely refers to the power to?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Judicial Review is the judiciary’s power to examine and pronounce upon the constitutionality of laws enacted by the legislature and orders issued by the executive.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · The Judiciary: Structure and Judicial Appointments

Q21. Which two Articles of the Constitution are together most closely associated with expressing the power of judicial review in India?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Article 32 (Supreme Court) and Article 226 (High Courts) together most directly express India’s constitutional power of judicial review through the writ jurisdiction they confer.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Article 143 of the Constitution · Article 32 of the Constitution · Article 45 of the Constitution

Q22. After retiring from the Supreme Court, can a former Judge plead or practise law before any court or authority in India?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

A retired permanent Judge of the Supreme Court is constitutionally barred from pleading or acting in any court or before any authority in India.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Judges of the Supreme Court of India

Q23. The Supreme Court of India, as a ‘Court of Record’ under Article 129, has the power to?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Correct: punish for its own contempt. Article 129 says the Supreme Court is a court of record. It has all the powers of such a court, including power to punish contempt of itself.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Amending the Constitution and the Basic Structure Doctrine · Article 85: Prorogation and Dissolution of Parliament · The Judge Impeachment Process: Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

Beyond the answer

    [privacy-do-not-sell-link]
    ✨Ask doubt
    ✨ Ask a Question AI×
    [privacy-do-not-sell-link]