Menu

The Supreme Court — MCQs with Answers (Set 6)

The Supreme Court sits at the very top of India’s judicial system. It began in 1950 with just eight judges. Today it has thirty-eight. But its central job has never changed. It is the final court of appeal, and the guardian of the Constitution.

Read the Article: The Supreme Court →

0 / 18 correct · click an option to check it

Q1. Under the Supreme Court’s Advisory Jurisdiction, is the Court obligated to tender its opinion whenever the President refers a matter to it?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Unlike its other jurisdictions, in its Advisory Jurisdiction the Supreme Court is not constitutionally bound to render an opinion, even when the President refers a matter, though it typically does.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q2. Besides original and appellate jurisdiction, the Supreme Court also possesses which third type of jurisdiction, under which it may render an opinion to the President on questions of law or fact?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Under its Advisory Jurisdiction, the Supreme Court may, if the President seeks it, give its opinion on a question of law or fact of public importance.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q3. Which of the following correctly describes the Supreme Court’s Original Jurisdiction?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

The Supreme Court’s Original Jurisdiction covers disputes directly between the Union and States, or between two or more States, heard without going through a lower court first.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q4. The Supreme Court’s power under Article 142 to pass any order necessary to do ‘complete justice’ in a matter before it is significant chiefly because it?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Article 142’s ‘complete justice’ power is a wide discretionary power that ordinary statutory limitations cannot restrict, distinguishing it from the Court’s other jurisdictions.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q5. Under which Article of the Constitution does the Supreme Court have the power to review its own earlier judgement or order?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

Article 137 grants the Supreme Court the power to review any of its own judgements or orders, subject to conditions prescribed by the Court.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Article 131 of the Constitution · Article 143 of the Constitution

Q6. Retired Chief Justices and Judges of the Supreme Court are entitled to a monthly pension amounting to what percentage of their last drawn salary?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Retired Chief Justices and Judges of the Supreme Court are entitled to a pension of 50 percent of their last drawn salary.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q7. The procedural details of the impeachment process for a Supreme Court Judge are laid down in which legislation?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, lays down the detailed procedure for investigating and processing a motion to impeach a Supreme Court or High Court Judge.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · The Judge Impeachment Process: Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 · Contempt of Court: Law and Debates

Q8. To remove a Judge of the Supreme Court through impeachment, the motion must be supported in each House of Parliament by?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Removal of a Supreme Court Judge requires the motion to be supported by a majority of the total membership of each House and by not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q9. According to the Constitution, the seat of the Supreme Court of India shall ordinarily be in?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: D

The Supreme Court’s seat is New Delhi, though it can sit at other places the Chief Justice of India may, with the President’s approval, appoint.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q10. Under which Article of the Constitution can the President appoint a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court to act as Chief Justice of India when that office is vacant or the Chief Justice is unable to perform duties?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Article 126 empowers the President to appoint a Judge of the Supreme Court to discharge the duties of Chief Justice when that office is vacant or its holder is temporarily unable to act.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Article 131 of the Constitution · Article 244 of the Constitution

Q11. Every Judge of the Supreme Court of India is formally appointed by?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Judges of the Supreme Court are formally appointed by the President of India, under the process laid down in Article 124.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · The President of India · Judges of the Supreme Court of India

Q12. According to the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Minerva Mills case, harmony between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles is considered part of the Constitution’s?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

The Minerva Mills judgment held that the harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles is part of the Constitution’s basic structure.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Emergency Provisions · Basic Structure Doctrine and Constitutional Foundations

Q13. Which of the following is NOT one of the five main types of writs the Supreme Court and High Courts can issue?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

The Constitution specifically empowers courts to issue five distinct types of writs: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari and Quo Warranto. ‘Injunction’ is a different, more general legal remedy, used more broadly across various areas of Indian civil law. Each of these five specific writs serves a distinct legal function in directly protecting citizens’ Fundamental Rights.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q14. The Right to Constitutional Remedies, guaranteed under Article 32, is significant because it?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Article 32 gives every citizen a direct constitutional right to approach the Supreme Court whenever their Fundamental Rights are actually violated. Dr Ambedkar considered this specific article so essential that he called it the very ‘heart and soul’ of the entire Constitution. Without this powerful enforcement mechanism, Fundamental Rights would otherwise remain largely symbolic, without any effective means of practical enforcement.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q15. Enforcement of Fundamental Rights, through the issuing of writs, falls specifically under the jurisdiction of?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

The Supreme Court derives its writ jurisdiction from Article 32, while High Courts derive theirs from the separate Article 226. Article 32 itself is considered so vital that Dr Ambedkar famously called it the very ‘heart and soul’ of the Constitution. This dual court system gives citizens two separate, independent judicial avenues for enforcing their Fundamental Rights.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q16. The Judiciary is widely regarded as the?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Courts, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, hold the power to directly enforce Fundamental Rights when violated. This judicial role includes reviewing and striking down laws or government actions found to be unconstitutional. This robust protective role has made the judiciary a central pillar in safeguarding individual citizens’ rights against state overreach.

Related topics: The Supreme Court · Fundamental Rights vs. Fundamental Duties · Waiver of Fundamental Rights

Q17. In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court significantly clarified the Preamble’s legal status by ruling that it?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

This landmark 1973 ruling directly reversed the Supreme Court’s own earlier position, taken in the 1960 Berubari Union case. The Court held that while the Preamble is indeed part of the Constitution, it remains non-justiciable, meaning it cannot be directly enforced in court on its own. This ruling also established the influential ‘basic structure doctrine’, helping limit Parliament’s power to fundamentally alter the Constitution’s core character.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Q18. The Supreme Court of India was originally established under which constitutional document, replacing the earlier Federal Court?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

The Supreme Court of India, the country’s first fully independent apex court, was established under the Constitution of India, effective 26 January 1950.

Related topics: The Supreme Court

Beyond the answer

    [privacy-do-not-sell-link]
    ✨Ask doubt
    ✨ Ask a Question AI×
    [privacy-do-not-sell-link]